Better decisions through digital dissent.

Quorum turns a single question into a structured debate. A council of models argues from opposing roles, rebuts across rounds, and a chair synthesizes the verdict — so the reasoning, not just the answer, is yours to inspect.

Phase 01

The Inquiry

Every deliberation begins with a question worth the council's attention. State the decision plainly, tag it for context, and the framing carries through every round that follows.

The inquiry

Should we pivot our pricing to usage-based?

StrategicHigh Impact
Phase 02

Convening the Council

Assemble the voices. Each role argues from a distinct vantage and is backed by the model you choose — a Critic on Claude Opus, an Optimist on GPT-5, a Pragmatist on Gemini, and a Chair to synthesize. Set the depth and the number of rounds, then convene.

The council

Critic

Claude Opus 4.7

Optimist

GPT-5

Pragmatist

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Synthesizer

Chair

Claude Haiku 4.5
Depth
QuickStandardDeep
Rounds
123
Phase 03

The Deliberation

The council deliberates in the open. Positions form, rebuttals land, and arguments refine across rounds — every word visible as it is written. Nothing is hidden, and no consensus is assumed.

Round 1 of 2 · Initial Positions$0.012 · 23s
Critic

Claude Opus 4.7

Usage-based pricing trades predictable revenue for volatility your enterprise buyers cannot budget against.

Optimist

GPT-5

It aligns price with value and removes the barrier to entry — teams land small and expand automatically.

Pragmatist

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Start hybrid: a platform fee for predictability, metered usage above a generous included tier.

Phase 04

The Verdict

The Chair reads the room and renders judgment — separating genuine consensus from live dissent. You receive a single defensible position and a clear record of where the council still disagrees.

The verdict

Adopt usage-based pricing — but as a hybrid, rolled out to new customers first.

Consensus
  • A hybrid model (platform fee + metered usage) is the right structure.
  • Accurate, trusted metering must exist before anything is customer-facing.
  • Roll out to new customers first; migrate existing accounts with grandfathering.
Dissent
  • Whether the platform fee is a temporary ramp or a permanent floor.
  • How aggressively to push existing customers toward the new model.
See it in action

Step through a complete deliberation.

The inquiry

Should we pivot our pricing to usage-based?

1 / 3
Round 1 · Initial Positions
Critic

Claude Opus 4.7

Usage-based pricing trades predictable revenue for volatility. Enterprise buyers budget annually — a model they cannot forecast becomes a procurement obstacle, not a feature.

Optimist

GPT-5

Alignment of price with value is the whole game. It collapses the barrier to entry — a team starts at near-zero and grows into a large account without ever renegotiating.

Pragmatist

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Both positions assume a clean switch. The hard part is metering. A realistic path is a hybrid: a platform fee for predictability, usage above a generous included tier.

Every idea deserves a second opinion.
And a third.